Nista. What can a single-handed fisherman reach after the rope takes him overboard?
On Nista, five creels jammed in the shooting gate.
The back rope remained under tension, leading aft.
The deck arrangement left the skipper with one way to clear the problem.
He had to walk over that rope.
He became entangled while the fishing gear was being deployed.
The vessel kept moving. Still in gear.
It grounded three hours later.
The obvious focus is the entanglement.
Keep clear of the rope. Wear a PFD. Carry a knife.
All sensible controls.
But their location decides whether they remain controls during the emergency.
Knives were available near the hauler and baiting station.
None was found near the shooting gate.
There was no deployable ladder or similar means of reboarding.
The skipper probably wore a PFD. It came off underwater.
The report found no effective means for him to separate himself from the gear, return onboard or raise the alarm from the water.
That sequence matters.
Before entering the water, the skipper had a vessel, radio and safety equipment.
After entering it, he had whatever remained attached to his body or within immediate reach.
Nothing else.
A single-handed operation changes the control boundary.
The person exposed to the hazard is also the person expected to stop the machinery, cut the rope, transmit the distress call and recover himself.
One entanglement can remove every active control at once.
The report also found no written risk assessments onboard. All lifesaving apparatus and the EPIRB were out of date for service.
Those findings matter.
But paperwork alone would not have created separation from the back rope. It would not have placed a knife at the shooting gate. It would not have provided a way back onboard.
A risk assessment earns its value when it changes the physical job.
Can the gear jam?
Where must the operator stand to clear it?
Can he release the load without crossing the rope?
If he goes overboard, what can he activate from the water?
The skipper was known as safety conscious. He encouraged other fishermen to wear PFDs.
That deserves respect, not blame.
It also shows why personal caution is a weak final barrier. A careful operator can still be trapped by a task that leaves no recoverable failure.
The MAIB made no new recommendations because recommendations from previous fatal single-handed fishing investigations remained outstanding.
The practical test for any lone-working assessment is therefore physical.
Remove the operator from the normal position.
Put him where the casualty leaves him: overboard, entangled and unable to reach the wheelhouse.
Which controls still work from there?
#MaritimeSafety #MarineAccidentInvestigation #FishingVessels #ManOverboard #RiskAssessment
